Caleb Boman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-11-04 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2013-14	Sudbury Nickel Barons	NOJHL	2	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2014-15	Soo Thunderbirds	NOJHL	49	9	23	32	0.653	0.1091	0.1194	0.2719	0.2977
2015-16	Soo Thunderbirds	NOJHL	46	14	34	48	1.044	0.1743	0.1825	0.4344	0.4548
2017-18	Trenton Golden Hawks	OJHL	54	24	22	46	0.852	0.2088	0.1958	0.5865	0.5500
2018-19	Lakehead Univ.	USports-M	25	7	6	13	0.520	0.2744	0.3007	1.5241	1.6704
2019-20	Lakehead Univ.	USports-M	24	0	5	5	0.208	0.1099	0.1099	0.6105	0.6105
2020-21	Lakehead Univ.	USports-M	0	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2021-22	Brock Univ.	USports-M	12	2	5	7	0.583	0.3077	0.2933	1.7097	1.6298

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2016-17	Niagara	D1	AHA	FR	20	1	4	5	0.250

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.15

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.25

2016-17 · Niagara

+68.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

98%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4699

Defenseman overall

#1001

Defenseman born in 1997

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom

University of New England · 2016-17

1.654 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Patrick Stillar

SUNY Morrisville · 2011-12

1.154 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Scott Hudson

Manhattanville · 2008-09

1.231 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.