| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | Sioux City Musketeers | USHL | 56 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 0.339 | 0.2086 | 0.2215 | 0.9996 | 1.0613 |
| 2004-05 | Sioux City Musketeers | USHL | 54 | 30 | 31 | 61 | 1.130 | 0.6944 | 0.7023 | 3.3280 | 3.3658 |
| 2015-16 | — | KHL | 47 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 0.298 | 0.7448 | 0.6491 | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Luleå HF | SHL | 18 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.222 | 0.5555 | 0.4209 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Michigan State | D1 | BigTen | JR | 42 | 20 | 23 | 43 | 1.024 |
| 2006-07 | Michigan State | D1 | BigTen | SO | 42 | 18 | 25 | 43 | 1.024 |
| 2005-06 | Michigan State | D1 | BigTen | FR | 29 | 4 | 15 | 19 | 0.655 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.