IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Kennedy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-04-30 Country: USA
2005 · Round 6, Pick #181  ·  Washington Capitals Washington Capitals
Signed Professionally
Luleå HF · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 56 9 10 19 0.339 0.2002 0.2126 1.0191 1.0820
2004-05 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 54 30 31 61 1.130 0.6664 0.6740 3.3926 3.4311
2015-16 — KHL 47 4 10 14 0.298 0.7448 0.6491 4.1047 3.5774
2016-17 Luleå HF SHL 18 2 2 4 0.222 0.5555 0.4209 2.8994 2.1968
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Michigan State D1 BigTen JR 42 20 23 43 1.024
2006-07 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 42 18 25 43 1.024
2005-06 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 29 4 15 19 0.655
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.66
2005-06 · Michigan State
+56.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3500
Forward overall
#128
Forward born in 1986

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Hepler
Lebanon Valley · 2015-16
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Whitelaw
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Woodward
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.