icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
Toronto Maple Leafs
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | Oshawa Legionaires | OJHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2004-05 | Ottawa 67's | OHL | 23 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.043 | 0.0252 | 0.0285 | 0.1139 | 0.1287 |
| 2005-06 | Ottawa 67's | OHL | 48 | 19 | 13 | 32 | 0.667 | 0.3857 | 0.4167 | 1.7457 | 1.8858 |
| 2006-07 | Ottawa 67's | OHL | 61 | 21 | 25 | 46 | 0.754 | 0.4362 | 0.4479 | 1.9745 | 2.0274 |
| 2007-08 | Ottawa 67's | OHL | 22 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 0.500 | 0.2893 | 0.2828 | 1.3092 | 1.2797 |
| 2008-09 | Moncton Wildcats | QMJHL | 28 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0.357 | 0.1754 | 0.1636 | 0.9533 | 0.8889 |
| 2009-10 | Nipissing Univ. | USports-M | 23 | 15 | 17 | 32 | 1.391 | 0.7340 | 0.8018 | 4.0769 | 4.4533 |
| 2010-11 | Nipissing Univ. | USports-M | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-27 | Michigan State | D1 | BigTen | SO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.