← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Walters Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-04-04 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Västerås IK · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 52 4 22 26 0.500 0.1085 0.1189 0.3869 0.4239
2003-04 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 54 14 41 55 1.018 0.2209 0.2310 0.7880 0.8240
2004-05 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 56 26 73 99 1.768 0.3835 0.3842 1.3678 1.3704
2005-06 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 56 43 73 116 2.054 0.4454 0.4265 1.5889 1.5216
2010-11 Västerås IK Allsvenskan 52 16 11 27 0.519 1.2980 1.3376 4.8711 5.0196
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Union D1 ECAC SR 38 16 24 40 1.053
2008-09 Union D1 ECAC JR 35 13 15 28 0.800
2007-08 Union D1 ECAC SO 35 5 15 20 0.571
2006-07 Union D1 ECAC FR 35 8 19 27 0.771
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2006-07 · Union
+120.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1809
Forward overall
#57
Forward born in 1986

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.