| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-03 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 52 | 4 | 22 | 26 | 0.500 | 0.1085 | 0.1189 | 0.3869 | 0.4239 |
| 2003-04 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 54 | 14 | 41 | 55 | 1.018 | 0.2209 | 0.2310 | 0.7880 | 0.8240 |
| 2004-05 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 56 | 26 | 73 | 99 | 1.768 | 0.3835 | 0.3842 | 1.3678 | 1.3704 |
| 2005-06 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 56 | 43 | 73 | 116 | 2.054 | 0.4454 | 0.4265 | 1.5889 | 1.5216 |
| 2010-11 | Västerås IK | Allsvenskan | 52 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 0.519 | 1.2980 | 1.3376 | 4.8711 | 5.0196 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Union | D1 | ECAC | SR | 38 | 16 | 24 | 40 | 1.053 |
| 2008-09 | Union | D1 | ECAC | JR | 35 | 13 | 15 | 28 | 0.800 |
| 2007-08 | Union | D1 | ECAC | SO | 35 | 5 | 15 | 20 | 0.571 |
| 2006-07 | Union | D1 | ECAC | FR | 35 | 8 | 19 | 27 | 0.771 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.