David Coughlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1982-05-05 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2002-03	Brockville Braves	CCHL	51	15	15	0.294	0.0638	0.0574	0.2275	0.2047
2005-06	Concordia Univ.	USports-M	20	1	1	0.050	0.0264	0.0253	0.1466	0.1406
2006-07	Concordia Univ.	USports-M	18	1	1	0.056	0.0293	0.0266	0.1630	0.1478
2007-08	Concordia Univ.	USports-M	16	2	2	0.125	0.0659	0.0566	0.3664	0.3145

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

NCAAe Rankings

#26703

Defenseman overall

#1260

Defenseman born in 1982

D2/3 Comparables

Gordon Bell

SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06

0.800 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Josh Timpano

SUNY Oswego · 2017-18

0.500 Average

actual D2/3 PPG

Mike Connolly

Buffalo State · 2015-16

0.412 Average

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.