Adam Brace Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-06-26 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2004-05	Pembroke Lumber Kings	CCHL	56	5	9	14	0.250	0.0542	0.0603	0.1934	0.2153
2005-06	Pembroke Lumber Kings	CCHL	57	8	16	24	0.421	0.0913	0.0976	0.3258	0.3483
2006-07	Pembroke Lumber Kings	CCHL	54	31	32	63	1.167	0.2531	0.2581	0.9027	0.9204
2007-08	Pembroke Lumber Kings	CCHL	50	37	53	90	1.800	0.3904	0.3793	1.3927	1.3531
2015-16	Heilbronner Falken	DEL2	52	28	35	63	1.212	1.6229	1.7301	2.1739	2.3174

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2012-13	Robert Morris	D1	AHA	SR	38	14	27	41	1.079
2011-12	Robert Morris	D1	AHA	JR	29	14	9	23	0.793
2010-11	Robert Morris	D1	AHA	JR	35	12	16	28	0.800
2008-09	Canisius	D1	AHA	FR	33	6	17	23	0.697

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.28

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.70

2008-09 · Canisius

+146.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5671

Forward overall

#242

Forward born in 1988

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Woodward

SUNY Oswego · 2002-03

1.226 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Donny Flynn

Wilkes · 2016-17

1.423 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Lucas Signoretti

Buffalo State · 2024-25

1.120 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.