IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Calof Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-05-09 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Amur Khabarovsk · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 58 20 20 40 0.690 0.2202 0.2455 0.5339 0.5953
2008-09 Nepean Raiders CCHL 59 47 53 100 1.695 0.5412 0.5717 1.3120 1.3859
2009-10 Nepean Raiders CCHL 57 45 52 97 1.702 0.5434 0.5490 1.3174 1.3309
2014-15 Skellefteå AIK SHL 53 16 19 35 0.660 1.6510 1.8573 — —
2015-16 Skellefteå AIK SHL 52 19 15 34 0.654 1.6345 1.7449 — —
2016-17 Skellefteå AIK SHL 52 6 11 17 0.327 0.8173 0.8246 — —
2017-18 Växjö Lakers HC SHL 52 24 17 41 0.788 1.9712 1.9257 — —
2018-19 Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod KHL 58 22 19 41 0.707 1.7672 1.7564 — —
2019-20 Traktor Chelyabinsk KHL 55 8 25 33 0.600 1.5000 1.5000 — —
2020-21 Växjö Lakers HC SHL 39 14 25 39 1.000 2.5000 2.5000 — —
2021-22 Växjö Lakers HC SHL 34 5 8 13 0.382 0.9560 0.7682 — —
2022-23 Amur Khabarovsk KHL 16 1 1 2 0.125 0.3125 0.2342 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Princeton D1 ECAC SR 22 4 17 21 0.955
2012-13 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 31 14 24 38 1.226
2011-12 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 32 17 14 31 0.969
2010-11 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 32 9 24 33 1.031
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.52
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.03
2010-11 · Princeton
+98.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1472
Forward overall
#72
Forward born in 1991

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Petriello
Buffalo State · 2004-05
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Ciappa
St. John Fisher · 2022-23
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Pionk
St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.