icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-03 | St. Michael's Buzzers | OJHL | 10 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.300 | 0.0735 | 0.0788 | 0.2054 | 0.2202 |
| 2003-04 | St. Louis Heartland Eagles | USHL | 52 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0.231 | 0.1361 | 0.1427 | 0.6800 | 0.7130 |
| 2004-05 | Green Bay Gamblers | USHL | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Tufts | D3 | — | SR | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.500 |
| 2007-08 | Tufts | D3 | — | JR | 10 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.600 |
| 2006-07 | Tufts | D3 | — | SO | 19 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 1.053 |
| 2005-06 | Tufts | D3 | — | FR | 22 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 0.864 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.