| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Cornwall Colts | CCHL | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.600 | 0.1916 | 0.2182 | 0.4645 | 0.5290 |
| 2009-10 | Cornwall Colts | CCHL | 61 | 23 | 46 | 69 | 1.131 | 0.3612 | 0.3947 | 0.8756 | 0.9567 |
| 2010-11 | Cornwall Colts | CCHL | 56 | 37 | 61 | 98 | 1.750 | 0.5588 | 0.5830 | 1.3547 | 1.4133 |
| 2011-12 | Cornwall Colts | CCHL | 47 | 35 | 46 | 81 | 1.723 | 0.5503 | 0.5459 | 1.3341 | 1.3233 |
| 2017-18 | Örebro HK | SHL | 52 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 0.346 | 0.8655 | 0.9168 | — | — |
| 2018-19 | Örebro HK | SHL | 29 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.069 | 0.1725 | 0.1742 | — | — |
| 2019-20 | Ässät | Liiga | 50 | 16 | 19 | 35 | 0.700 | 1.7500 | 1.7500 | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Schwenninger Wild Wings | DEL | 36 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 0.583 | 0.6379 | 0.6379 | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Schwenninger Wild Wings | DEL | 45 | 13 | 19 | 32 | 0.711 | 0.7777 | 0.7512 | — | — |
| 2022-23 | Schwenninger Wild Wings | DEL | 54 | 31 | 19 | 50 | 0.926 | 1.0126 | 0.9483 | — | — |
| 2023-24 | Schwenninger Wild Wings | DEL | 30 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 0.500 | 0.5468 | 0.4840 | — | — |
| 2024-25 | Schwenninger Wild Wings | DEL | 52 | 23 | 25 | 48 | 0.923 | 1.0095 | 0.8472 | — | — |
| 2025-26 | Schwenninger Wild Wings | DEL | 48 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 0.646 | 0.7062 | 0.6257 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | SR | 37 | 14 | 23 | 37 | 1.000 |
| 2014-15 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | JR | 37 | 14 | 17 | 31 | 0.838 |
| 2013-14 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | SO | 39 | 10 | 23 | 33 | 0.846 |
| 2012-13 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | FR | 35 | 7 | 20 | 27 | 0.771 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.