| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Cornwall Colts | CCHL | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.250 | 0.0798 | 0.0909 | 0.1935 | 0.2204 |
| 2009-10 | Cornwall Colts | CCHL | 62 | 19 | 39 | 58 | 0.935 | 0.2987 | 0.3264 | 0.7242 | 0.7913 |
| 2010-11 | Cornwall Colts | CCHL | 50 | 30 | 57 | 87 | 1.740 | 0.5556 | 0.5796 | 1.3469 | 1.4051 |
| 2011-12 | Cornwall Colts | CCHL | 25 | 22 | 40 | 62 | 2.480 | 0.7919 | 0.7855 | 1.9198 | 1.9043 |
| 2017-18 | Örebro HK | SHL | 48 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 0.375 | 0.9375 | 0.9931 | — | — |
| 2018-19 | Örebro HK | SHL | 51 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 0.196 | 0.4902 | 0.4949 | — | — |
| 2019-20 | Ässät | Liiga | 52 | 13 | 19 | 32 | 0.615 | 1.5385 | 1.5385 | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Schwenninger Wild Wings | DEL | 38 | 12 | 16 | 28 | 0.737 | 0.8058 | 0.8058 | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Schwenninger Wild Wings | DEL | 41 | 10 | 21 | 31 | 0.756 | 0.8269 | 0.7987 | — | — |
| 2022-23 | Schwenninger Wild Wings | DEL | 56 | 16 | 28 | 44 | 0.786 | 0.8592 | 0.8046 | — | — |
| 2023-24 | Schwenninger Wild Wings | DEL | 44 | 7 | 20 | 27 | 0.614 | 0.6710 | 0.5939 | — | — |
| 2024-25 | Schwenninger Wild Wings | DEL | 47 | 13 | 25 | 38 | 0.808 | 0.8842 | 0.7420 | — | — |
| 2025-26 | Schwenninger Wild Wings | DEL | 50 | 11 | 19 | 30 | 0.600 | 0.6562 | 0.5814 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | SR | 37 | 13 | 21 | 34 | 0.919 |
| 2014-15 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | JR | 23 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 0.870 |
| 2013-14 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | SO | 37 | 14 | 16 | 30 | 0.811 |
| 2012-13 | Colgate | D1 | ECAC | FR | 36 | 13 | 18 | 31 | 0.861 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.