IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Edwards Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-07-21 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Queen's Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 52 11 32 43 0.827 0.1794 0.1919 0.6398 0.6843
2012-13 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 54 20 25 45 0.833 0.1807 0.1853 0.6447 0.6611
2013-14 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 39 8 17 25 0.641 0.1390 0.1356 0.4959 0.4838
2017-18 Queen's Univ. USports-M 28 8 8 16 0.571 0.3015 0.2966 1.6748 1.6474
2018-19 Queen's Univ. USports-M 28 5 9 14 0.500 0.2638 0.2457 1.4655 1.3650
2019-20 Queen's Univ. USports-M 27 3 9 12 0.444 0.2345 0.2345 1.3025 1.3025
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Niagara D1 AHA SO 18 1 4 5 0.278
2014-15 Niagara D1 AHA FR 26 3 1 4 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2014-15 · Niagara
+15.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19297
Forward overall
#761
Forward born in 1994

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2017-18
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Blasko
Nazareth · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.