IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Kuffner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-12 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Augsburger Panther · DEL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Rockland Nationals CCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Rockland Nationals CCHL 49 22 23 45 0.918 0.1992 0.2132 0.7106 0.7606
2014-15 Rockland Nationals CCHL 49 33 37 70 1.429 0.3099 0.3174 1.1053 1.1320
2020-21 ERC Ingolstadt DEL 31 7 7 14 0.452 1.1290 1.1290 3.8288 3.8288
2022-23 Augsburger Panther DEL 54 15 17 32 0.593 1.4815 1.6427 5.0242 5.5708
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Princeton D1 ECAC SR 31 22 22 44 1.419
2017-18 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 36 29 23 52 1.444
2016-17 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 34 19 17 36 1.059
2015-16 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 31 5 15 20 0.645
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2015-16 · Princeton
+173.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#4689
Forward overall
#243
Forward born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.