Ryan Kuffner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-12 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2012-13	Rockland Nationals	CCHL	3	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2013-14	Rockland Nationals	CCHL	49	22	23	45	0.918	0.2932	0.3138	0.7109	0.7609
2014-15	Rockland Nationals	CCHL	49	33	37	70	1.429	0.4562	0.4672	1.1059	1.1326
2020-21	ERC Ingolstadt	DEL	31	7	7	14	0.452	0.4939	0.4939	—	—
2022-23	Augsburger Panther	DEL	54	15	17	32	0.593	0.6481	0.7186	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2018-19	Princeton	D1	ECAC	SR	31	22	22	44	1.419
2017-18	Princeton	D1	ECAC	JR	36	29	23	52	1.444
2016-17	Princeton	D1	ECAC	SO	34	19	17	36	1.059
2015-16	Princeton	D1	ECAC	FR	31	5	15	20	0.645

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.35

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.65

2015-16 · Princeton

+85.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

90%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4460

Forward overall

#236

Forward born in 1996

D2/3 Comparables

James Duhamel

Norwich · 2003-04

0.692 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Arturas Laukaitis

Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16

0.667 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Mike Fiume

Neumann · 2001-02

1.040 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.