IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charles Poirier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-10-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Rockland Nationals CCHL 10 1 2 3 0.300 0.0651 0.0648 0.2321 0.2311
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 32 3 16 19 0.594
2024-25 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 32 3 16 19 0.594
2023-24 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 32 3 16 19 0.594
2022-23 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 32 3 16 19 0.594
2021-22 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 32 3 16 19 0.594
2020-21 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 — — 32 3 16 19 0.594

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17818
Defenseman overall
#3258
Defenseman born in 2004
#1433
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Sommerville
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Gintoli
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Boswell
Nichols · 2023-24
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.