IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zack MacQueen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-08-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Sarnia Sting OHL 63 11 12 23 0.365 0.2179 0.2211 0.9457 0.9594
2010-11 Windsor Spitfires OHL 68 15 29 44 0.647 0.3862 0.3726 1.6761 1.6172
2011-12 Windsor Spitfires OHL 56 18 20 38 0.679 0.4050 0.3701 1.7577 1.6061
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Tufts D3 — SO 5 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Tufts D3 — FR 5 0 1 1 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2014-15 · Tufts
-37.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7172
Forward overall
#277
Forward born in 1991
#835
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Marra
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.161 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Boyd Stahlbaum
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Braden Desmet
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.