| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Sarnia Sting | OHL | 63 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 0.365 | 0.2112 | 0.2143 | 0.9381 | 0.9517 |
| 2010-11 | Windsor Spitfires | OHL | 68 | 15 | 29 | 44 | 0.647 | 0.3743 | 0.3612 | 1.6627 | 1.6043 |
| 2011-12 | Windsor Spitfires | OHL | 56 | 18 | 20 | 38 | 0.679 | 0.3926 | 0.3587 | 1.7437 | 1.5933 |
| 2012-13 | St. Francis Xavier Univ. | USports-M | 28 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0.393 | 0.2073 | 0.2243 | 1.1516 | 1.2460 |
| 2013-14 | St. Francis Xavier Univ. | USports-M | 28 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 0.464 | 0.2450 | 0.2535 | 1.3609 | 1.4080 |
| 2014-15 | St. Francis Xavier Univ. | USports-M | 24 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 0.417 | 0.2199 | 0.2161 | 1.2213 | 1.2003 |
| 2015-16 | St. Francis Xavier Univ. | USports-M | 20 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.500 | 0.2638 | 0.2463 | 1.4655 | 1.3680 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Tufts | D3 | NESCAC | SO | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2014-15 | Tufts | D3 | NESCAC | FR | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.200 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.