Ottoville Leppänen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-18 Country: Finland

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2016-17	Kiekko-Espoo U20	SM-Liiga-Jr	31	12	15	27	0.871	0.4721	0.4911	1.3172	1.3702
2017-18	Kiekko-Espoo U20	SM-Liiga-Jr	53	22	31	53	1.000	0.5420	0.5261	1.5123	1.4679
2023-24	Jukurit	Liiga	41	7	8	15	0.366	0.9147	0.9549	3.1453	3.2835
2024-25	Kiekko-Espoo	Liiga	56	8	8	16	0.286	0.7143	0.7207	2.4559	2.4780

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2022-23	Merrimack	D1	HockeyEast	—	38	6	19	25	0.658
2021-22	RPI	D1	ECAC	—	42	9	21	30	0.714
2019-20	RPI	D1	ECAC	SO	33	4	10	14	0.424
2019-20	Rensselaer	D1	—	SO	33	4	10	14	0.424
2018-19	RPI	D1	ECAC	FR	36	4	15	19	0.528
2018-19	Rensselaer	D1	—	FR	36	4	15	19	0.528

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.48

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.53

2018-19 · RPI

+10.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

88%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2739

Forward overall

#141

Forward born in 1998

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Kalinowski

Endicott · 2015-16

1.310 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Rihards Marenis

Aurora · 2013-14

1.000 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Zach Dill

Salem State · 2021-22

1.111 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.