IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Filip Fornåå Svensson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-05 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Vimmerby HC · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Linköping HC U20 SHL-J20 41 4 10 14 0.342 0.1896 0.1949 0.4546 0.4672
2017-18 Linköping HC U20 SuperElit 45 11 13 24 0.533 0.2104 0.2058 0.7347 0.7186
2018-19 Linköping HC U20 SuperElit 44 19 21 40 0.909 0.3587 0.3334 1.2525 1.1641
2025-26 Vimmerby HC Allsvenskan 44 9 10 19 0.432 1.0795 1.0905 4.0490 4.0903
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 35 5 4 9 0.257
2022-23 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast — 28 6 6 12 0.429
2021-22 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 34 9 16 25 0.735
2020-21 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 24 2 2 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2019-20 · Alaska Fairbanks
-31.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#2822
Forward overall
#113
Forward born in 1999

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.