Filip Engarås Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-16 Country: Sweden

2020 · Round 6, Pick #169 ·

Edmonton Oilers

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2015-16	Skellefteå AIK U20	SHL-J20	10	0	1	1	0.100	0.0555	0.0610	0.1331	0.1462
2016-17	Skellefteå AIK U20	SHL-J20	38	10	9	19	0.500	0.2777	0.2904	0.6656	0.6960
2017-18	Skellefteå AIK U20	SuperElit	40	16	18	34	0.850	0.3354	0.3341	1.1710	1.1664
2025-26	Södertälje SK	Allsvenskan	51	12	10	22	0.431	1.0785	1.1089	4.0452	4.1591

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2021-22	New Hampshire	D1	HockeyEast	SR	33	7	14	21	0.636
2020-21	New Hampshire	D1	HockeyEast	JR	22	6	5	11	0.500
2019-20	New Hampshire	D1	HockeyEast	SO	25	8	7	15	0.600
2018-19	New Hampshire	D1	HockeyEast	—	0	0	0	0	0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

100%

NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#2941

Forward overall

#122

Forward born in 1999

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.