IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Antti Tuomisto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-20 Country: Finland
2019 · Round 2, Pick #35  ·  Detroit Red Wings Detroit Red Wings
Signed Professionally
Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — SM-Liiga-Jr 45 9 26 35 0.778 0.4216 0.4489 1.1763 1.2526
2019-20 — SM-Liiga-Jr 48 15 34 49 1.021 0.5533 0.5533 1.5438 1.5438
2022-23 — Liiga 60 5 15 20 0.333 0.8332 1.0042 2.8651 3.4531
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Denver D1 NCHC SO 35 1 8 9 0.257
2020-21 Denver D1 NCHC FR 24 2 9 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2020-21 · Denver
+8.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 34 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.