IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Antti Tuomisto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-20 Country: Finland
Signed Professionally
Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — SM-Liiga-Jr 45 9 26 35 0.778 0.4143 0.4327 1.0995 1.1485
2019-20 — SM-Liiga-Jr 48 15 34 49 1.021 0.5438 0.5438 1.4430 1.4430
2022-23 — Liiga 60 5 15 20 0.333 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Denver D1 NCHC SO 35 1 8 9 0.257
2020-21 Denver D1 NCHC FR 24 2 9 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2020-21 · Denver
+12.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Will Butcher
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Clark Kuster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.31 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Nuttle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Cornell
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
Luke Voltin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brent Wold
Utica · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Fiume
Neumann · 2001-02
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ikki Kogawa
Wisconsin-Superior · 2021-22
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.