← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oscar Geschwind Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-24 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Örebro HK U20 SuperElit 36 3 7 10 0.278 0.1096 0.1136 0.3773 0.3910
2019-20 Örebro HK U20 SuperElit 42 20 13 33 0.786 0.3100 0.3100 1.0671 1.0671
2020-21 Örebro HK U20 SuperElit 18 8 6 14 0.778 0.3069 0.3069 1.0563 1.0563
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 American International D1 AHA GR 36 5 7 12 0.333
2023-24 American International D1 AHA SR 32 2 8 10 0.312
2022-23 American International D1 AHA JR 35 8 7 15 0.429
2021-22 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 15 2 3 5 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2021-22 · Northern Michigan
+242.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9610
Forward overall
#423
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ RPI (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2018-19
0.793 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2012-13
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.