IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Soubry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.1925 0.2065 0.6306 0.6763
2013-14 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 52 6 4 10 0.192 0.0493 0.0506 0.1450 0.1488
2014-15 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 54 6 6 12 0.222 0.0816 0.0794 0.2345 0.2283
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Augsburg D1 MIAC SR 28 0 4 4 0.143
2018-19 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 28 0 4 4 0.143
2017-18 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 19 1 4 5 0.263
2016-17 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 27 3 3 6 0.222
2015-16 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#51906
Forward overall
#2302
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Topher Flanagan
Amherst · 2010-11
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Filippelli
Wilkes · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.