IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Topher Flanagan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-02-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Canmore Eagles AJHL 51 6 8 14 0.275 0.0921 0.0983 0.2540 0.2712
2009-10 Canmore Eagles AJHL 57 8 12 20 0.351 0.1177 0.1196 0.3247 0.3301
2010-11 — AJHL 53 9 22 31 0.585 0.1962 0.1891 0.5413 0.5218
2011-12 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 60 29 27 56 0.933 0.3130 0.2858 0.8637 0.7887
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 26 4 10 14 0.538
2014-15 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 27 8 16 24 0.889
2013-14 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 27 6 9 15 0.556
2012-13 Amherst D3 NESCAC FR 18 2 5 7 0.389
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2012-13 · Amherst
+83.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24259
Forward overall
#881
Forward born in 1991
#658
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Zappia
SUNY Cortland · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Caden Pendo
Chatham · 2024-25
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn Metheral
Wentworth · 2000-01
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.