Emil Westerlund Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-16 Country: Sweden

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2014-15	Linköping HC U20	SuperElit	0	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2015-16	Linköping HC U20	SHL-J20	38	7	9	16	0.421	0.2340	0.2425	0.5611	0.5816
2016-17	Linköping HC U20	SuperElit	44	28	11	39	0.886	0.3498	0.3491	1.2038	1.2012
2022-23	Almtuna IS	Allsvenskan	43	1	1	2	0.046	0.1162	0.1189	0.4363	0.4466

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2021-22	Maine	D1	HockeyEast	—	14	0	0	0	0.000
2020-21	Maine	D1	HockeyEast	SR	16	4	5	9	0.562
2019-20	Maine	D1	HockeyEast	JR	18	1	6	7	0.389
2018-19	Maine	D1	HockeyEast	SO	34	6	3	9	0.265
2017-18	Maine	D1	HockeyEast	FR	34	7	6	13	0.382

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.26

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.38

2017-18 · Maine

+45.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

92%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17188

Forward overall

#810

Forward born in 1998

D2/3 Comparables

Manny Gialedakis

SUNY Oswego · 2016-17

0.750 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Lee Stubbs

Manhattanville · 2005-06

1.115 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Simren Sandhu

St. Scholastica · 2009-10

0.360 Average

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.