← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oskar Jellvik Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-08 Country: Sweden
2021 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #149  ·  Boston Bruins Boston Bruins
Signed Professionally
SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 SuperElit 15 2 2 4 0.267 0.1045 0.1045 0.3276 0.3276
2020-21 SuperElit 13 6 6 12 0.923 0.3617 0.3617 1.1338 1.1338
2021-22 SuperElit 41 26 29 55 1.341 0.5256 0.5160 1.6478 1.6177
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston College D1 HockeyEast SR 9 2 1 3 0.333
2024-25 Boston College D1 HockeyEast JR 23 4 9 13 0.565
2023-24 Boston College D1 HockeyEast SO 41 13 29 42 1.024
2022-23 Boston College D1 HockeyEast FR 34 4 13 17 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.48
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2022-23 · Boston College
+4.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3657
Forward overall
#86
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Marian (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Boston College (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ UMass
0.57 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2016-17
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.