IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casper Nässén Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-11 Country: Sweden
2023 · Round 7, Pick #214  ·  Boston Bruins Boston Bruins
Signed Professionally
Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 — SuperElit 12 0 1 1 0.083 0.0329 0.0342 0.1131 0.1177
2022-23 — SuperElit 48 23 17 40 0.833 0.3288 0.3294 1.1317 1.1338
2023-24 — SuperElit 41 16 15 31 0.756 0.2984 0.2815 1.0269 0.9686
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Miami D1 NCHC — 36 6 12 18 0.500
2024-25 Miami D1 NCHC — 34 6 4 10 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2024-25 · Miami
+14.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9727
Forward overall
#391
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cameron Brown
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Filip Jakobsson
Canton · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
JC Humphreys
SUNY Cortland · 2023-24
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ty Enns
Marian · 2017-18
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.