← New Search ↗ Social Card

Viktor Stålberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-01-17 Country: Sweden
2006 · Round 6, Pick #161  ·  Toronto Maple Leafs Toronto Maple Leafs
Signed Professionally
Avangard Omsk · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 41 27 26 53 1.293 0.5101 0.4747 1.7556 1.6338
2012-13 Atlant Mytishchi KHL 14 3 7 10 0.714 1.7858 1.8338 9.8421 10.1064
2018-19 Avangard Omsk KHL 29 7 4 11 0.379 0.9483 0.6909 5.2263 3.8079
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 39 24 22 46 1.179
2007-08 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 39 10 13 23 0.590
2006-07 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 39 7 8 15 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2006-07 · Vermont
-5.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 38 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#273
Forward overall
#8
Forward born in 1986

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.