| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Frölunda HC U20 | SuperElit | 41 | 27 | 26 | 53 | 1.293 | 0.5065 | 0.4714 | 1.5878 | 1.4776 |
| 2012-13 | Atlant Mytishchi | KHL | 14 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.714 | 1.7858 | 1.8338 | — | — |
| 2018-19 | Avangard Omsk | KHL | 29 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 0.379 | 0.9483 | 0.6909 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Vermont | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 39 | 24 | 22 | 46 | 1.179 |
| 2007-08 | Vermont | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 39 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 0.590 |
| 2006-07 | Vermont | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 39 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 0.385 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.