← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Pomerleau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 L/A Nordiques NA3HL 46 4 38 42 0.913 0.1146 0.1146 0.2882 0.2882
2021-22 Thunder Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 38 5 11 16 0.421 0.0551 0.0567 0.1429 0.1471
2022-23 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 49 4 21 25 0.510 0.2080 0.2069 0.4101 0.4080
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Liberty University ACHA_D1 29 3 22 25 0.862
2024-25 Liberty University ACHA_D1 29 3 22 25 0.862
2023-24 Liberty University ACHA_D1 29 3 22 25 0.862
2022-23 Liberty University ACHA_D1 29 3 22 25 0.862
2021-22 Liberty University ACHA_D1 29 3 22 25 0.862
2020-21 Liberty University ACHA_D1 29 3 22 25 0.862
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2020-21 · Liberty University
+696.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
12%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5173
Defenseman overall
#1280
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2015-16
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2016-17
0.448 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.