← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendon Gysbers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 58 7 20 27 0.466 0.1728 0.1702 0.4929 0.4854
2017-18 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 58 6 27 33 0.569 0.2113 0.1976 0.6025 0.5636
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 17 0 6 6 0.353
2020-21 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 22 4 11 15 0.682
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 31 4 23 27 0.871
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.87
2018-19 · St. Norbert
+394.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4317
Defenseman overall
#878
Defenseman born in 1997
#2028
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Buffalo State · 2008-09
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2010-11
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.