| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Frölunda HC U20 | SuperElit | 21 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.191 | 0.0752 | 0.0781 | 0.2587 | 0.2688 |
| 2008-09 | Frölunda HC U20 | SuperElit | 41 | 18 | 24 | 42 | 1.024 | 0.4042 | 0.3996 | 1.3912 | 1.3753 |
| 2014-15 | Frölunda HC | SHL | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.333 | 0.8332 | 0.8884 | 4.3491 | 4.6373 |
| 2015-16 | Frölunda HC | SHL | 51 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 0.275 | 0.6863 | 0.6923 | 3.5818 | 3.6133 |
| 2016-17 | Frölunda HC | SHL | 49 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 0.347 | 0.8672 | 0.8239 | 4.5266 | 4.3008 |
| 2017-18 | Frölunda HC | SHL | 50 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 0.280 | 0.7000 | 0.6427 | 3.6536 | 3.3545 |
| 2018-19 | Frölunda HC | SHL | 45 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.200 | 0.5000 | 0.4342 | 2.6097 | 2.2665 |
| 2019-20 | Frölunda HC | SHL | 47 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.064 | 0.1595 | 0.1595 | 0.8325 | 0.8325 |
| 2020-21 | Sport | Liiga | 54 | 12 | 17 | 29 | 0.537 | 1.3425 | 1.3425 | 4.6161 | 4.6161 |
| 2021-22 | Sport | Liiga | 58 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 0.414 | 1.0345 | 0.7071 | 3.5571 | 2.4315 |
| 2022-23 | — | Liiga | 58 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 0.414 | 1.0345 | 0.6842 | 3.5571 | 2.3526 |
| 2023-24 | Sport | Liiga | 60 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 0.417 | 1.0417 | 0.6559 | 3.5820 | 2.2555 |
| 2024-25 | Sport | Liiga | 60 | 13 | 16 | 29 | 0.483 | 1.2083 | 0.7187 | 4.1545 | 2.4709 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Vermont | D1 | HockeyEast | JR | 34 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 0.912 |
| 2010-11 | Vermont | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 36 | 9 | 19 | 28 | 0.778 |
| 2009-10 | Vermont | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 36 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 0.528 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.