← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sebastian Stålberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-03-06 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Sport · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 21 2 2 4 0.191 0.0746 0.0775 0.2340 0.2432
2008-09 Frölunda HC U20 SuperElit 41 18 24 42 1.024 0.4014 0.3968 1.2583 1.2439
2014-15 Frölunda HC SHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.8332 0.8884
2015-16 Frölunda HC SHL 51 10 4 14 0.275 0.6863 0.6923
2016-17 Frölunda HC SHL 49 8 9 17 0.347 0.8672 0.8239
2017-18 Frölunda HC SHL 50 5 9 14 0.280 0.7000 0.6427
2018-19 Frölunda HC SHL 45 3 6 9 0.200 0.5000 0.4342
2019-20 Frölunda HC SHL 47 1 2 3 0.064 0.1595 0.1595
2020-21 Sport Liiga 54 12 17 29 0.537 1.3425 1.3425
2021-22 Sport Liiga 58 12 12 24 0.414 1.0345 0.7071
2022-23 Liiga 58 13 11 24 0.414 1.0345 0.6842
2023-24 Sport Liiga 60 9 16 25 0.417 1.0417 0.6559
2024-25 Sport Liiga 60 13 16 29 0.483 1.2083 0.7187
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 34 12 19 31 0.912
2010-11 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 36 9 19 28 0.778
2009-10 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 36 6 13 19 0.528
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2009-10 · Vermont
+129.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1160
Forward overall
#52
Forward born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2015-16
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2022-23
1.031 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.