← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Thang Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-05-11 Country: USA
2007 · Round 3, Pick #81  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
Signed Professionally
HIFK · Liiga

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 58 9 22 31 0.534 0.3153 0.3351 1.6039 1.7046
2005-06 — USHL 57 23 29 52 0.912 0.5382 0.5438 2.7375 2.7659
2012-13 Augsburger Panther DEL 50 14 15 29 0.580 1.4500 1.5969 4.9163 5.4142
2013-14 HIFK Liiga 28 3 4 7 0.250 0.6250 0.6381 2.1486 2.1937
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SR 37 9 14 23 0.622
2008-09 Notre Dame D1 BigTen JR 33 10 9 19 0.576
2007-08 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 47 18 14 32 0.681
2006-07 Notre Dame D1 BigTen FR 42 20 21 41 0.976
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.98
2006-07 · Notre Dame
+147.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3940
Forward overall
#142
Forward born in 1987

D2/3 Comparables

Lebanon Valley · 2015-16
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.