icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Sioux Falls Stampede | USHL | 58 | 9 | 22 | 31 | 0.534 | 0.3286 | 0.3492 | 1.5747 | 1.6736 |
| 2005-06 | — | USHL | 57 | 23 | 29 | 52 | 0.912 | 0.5608 | 0.5666 | 2.6878 | 2.7157 |
| 2012-13 | Augsburger Panther | DEL | 50 | 14 | 15 | 29 | 0.580 | 0.6343 | 0.6985 | — | — |
| 2013-14 | HIFK | Liiga | 28 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.250 | 0.6250 | 0.6381 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Notre Dame | D1 | — | SR | 37 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 0.622 |
| 2008-09 | Notre Dame | D1 | — | JR | 33 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 0.576 |
| 2007-08 | Notre Dame | D1 | — | SO | 47 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 0.681 |
| 2006-07 | Notre Dame | D1 | — | FR | 42 | 20 | 21 | 41 | 0.976 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.