icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
Washington Capitals
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Sioux Falls Stampede | USHL | 55 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 0.236 | 0.1395 | 0.1492 | 0.7100 | 0.7594 |
| 2016-17 | HIFK | Liiga | 46 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.174 | 0.4347 | 0.3692 | 1.4949 | 1.2696 |
| 2017-18 | HIFK | Liiga | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2018-19 | HIFK | Liiga | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | SR | 27 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.370 |
| 2007-08 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | JR | 43 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 0.349 |
| 2006-07 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | SO | 41 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.171 |
| 2005-06 | North Dakota | D1 | NCHC | FR | 43 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.070 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.