← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Sedore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Erie Otters OHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Erie Otters OHL 48 2 9 11 0.229 0.1330 0.1330 0.5873 0.5873
2020-21 Erie Otters OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Erie Otters OHL 68 17 29 46 0.676 0.3926 0.3660 1.7335 1.6159
2022-23 Erie Otters OHL 66 16 19 35 0.530 0.3077 0.2735 1.3589 1.2079
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 AHA JR 16 0 2 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2025-26 · Mercyhurst
-53.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16173
Forward overall
#858
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2008-09
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2012-13
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.