IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Long Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-06-28 Country: USA
Cornell
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Pueblo Bulls USPHL-Premier 17 0 2 2 0.118 0.0154 0.0160 0.0399 0.0415
2023-24 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Elite 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0103 0.0097 0.0254 0.0240
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28517
Defenseman overall
#4362
Defenseman born in 2004
#7030
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Cornell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Hudson Gorski
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Michael Suda
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Sam Malinski
USHL 2017-18
0.64
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Sebastian Dirven
USHL 2017-18
0.14
actual FR PPG at Cornell

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Mathews
Castleton · 2023-24
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Rogers
Neumann · 2010-11
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chace McCardle
Trine · 2018-19
0.077 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.