IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Rogers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-06-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Brooks Bandits AJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1118 0.1214 0.3084 0.3348
2009-10 — BCHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0385 0.0396 0.1455 0.1496
2010-11 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 32 1 3 4 0.125 0.0320 0.0318 0.0942 0.0937
2011-12 — AJHL 55 5 24 29 0.527 0.1769 0.1647 0.4880 0.4544
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Neumann D3 MAC SR 26 2 8 10 0.385
2014-15 Neumann D3 MAC JR 25 2 8 10 0.400
2013-14 Neumann D3 MAC SO 23 1 12 13 0.565
2012-13 Neumann D3 MAC FR 25 2 3 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2012-13 · Neumann
+89.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17464
Defenseman overall
#1708
Defenseman born in 1991
#1947
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Roginski
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bobby Polachek
Fredonia · 2014-15
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy McGlynn
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.