IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Rogers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-06-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Brooks Bandits AJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1113 0.1208 0.3094 0.3359
2009-10 — BCHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0389 0.0400 0.1458 0.1499
2010-11 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 32 1 3 4 0.125 0.0361 0.0359 0.0941 0.0936
2011-12 — AJHL 55 5 24 29 0.527 0.1761 0.1640 0.4895 0.4558
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Neumann D3 MAC SR 26 2 8 10 0.385
2014-15 Neumann D3 MAC JR 25 2 8 10 0.400
2013-14 Neumann D3 MAC SO 23 1 12 13 0.565
2012-13 Neumann D3 MAC FR 25 2 3 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2012-13 · Neumann
+88.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12646
Defenseman overall
#1489
Defenseman born in 1991
#2262
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bobby Polachek
Fredonia · 2014-15
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Roginski
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manny Sanchez
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.