← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andy McGlynn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 36 16 19 35 0.972 0.1220 0.1383 0.3069 0.3480
2014-15 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 10 1 1 2 0.200 0.0735 0.0803 0.2111 0.2306
2015-16 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 56 7 20 27 0.482 0.1771 0.1857 0.5089 0.5335
2016-17 NAHL 51 11 19 30 0.588 0.2161 0.2148 0.6208 0.6171
2017-18 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 57 15 28 43 0.754 0.2772 0.2618 0.7963 0.7522
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 8 3 2 5 0.625
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SO 24 11 16 27 1.125
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen FR 25 6 9 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2018-19 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+188.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20562
Forward overall
#927
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2009-10
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2022-23
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.