IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bobby Polachek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-07-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 51 4 13 17 0.333 0.0817 0.0793 0.2295 0.2228
2014-15 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 21 5 5 10 0.476 0.1337 0.1286 0.3915 0.3767
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Fredonia D1 SUNYAC SR 22 1 4 5 0.227
2018-19 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SR 22 1 4 5 0.227
2017-18 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 23 7 3 10 0.435
2016-17 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 24 9 8 17 0.708
2015-16 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 24 7 16 23 0.958
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2015-16 · Fredonia
+928.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42723
Forward overall
#1713
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joel Gaulrapp
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Schulte
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Gaffney
Johnson & Wales · 2023-24
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.