IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bobby Polachek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-07-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 51 4 13 17 0.333 0.0931 0.0904 0.2300 0.2233
2014-15 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 21 5 5 10 0.476 0.1430 0.1376 0.3922 0.3774
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Fredonia D3 — SR 22 1 4 5 0.227
2017-18 Fredonia D3 — JR 23 7 3 10 0.435
2016-17 Fredonia D3 — SO 24 9 8 17 0.708
2015-16 Fredonia D3 — FR 24 7 16 23 0.958
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2015-16 · Fredonia
+843.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33019
Forward overall
#1369
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joel Gaulrapp
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Victor Tracy
Fredonia · 2016-17
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Schulte
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.