IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean McGurn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-30 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Univ. of New Brunswick · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0542 0.0639 0.1934 0.2279
2019-20 London Knights OHL 38 1 2 3 0.079 0.0456 0.0456 0.2027 0.2027
2020-21 London Knights OHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 London Knights OHL 66 20 53 73 1.106 0.6399 0.6101 2.8421 2.7099
2022-23 London Knights OHL 67 27 56 83 1.239 0.7166 0.6523 3.1831 2.8974
2023-24 Univ. of New Brunswick USports-M 30 9 20 29 0.967 0.5100 0.5540 2.8334 3.0777
2024-25 Univ. of New Brunswick USports-M 30 14 22 36 1.200 0.6331 0.6573 3.5172 3.6516
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arizona State D1 NCHC SO 32 4 9 13 0.406
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.57
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2025-26 · Arizona State
-29.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3673
Forward overall
#134
Forward born in 2002

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.