← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Emma Leahy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-05-03 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.18
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1894
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.47
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.4987
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

12%
NCAA D1W
2%
NCAA D3W
85%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 — 19U-AAA-W 13 2 4 6 0.462 0.1894 0.1894
2024-25 Berkshire NE-Prep-Girls 24 0 0 0 0.000 N/A N/A
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Connecticut College NESCAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Kendra Nealey USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG 0.212 Cornell
Grace Bizal USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.35 PPG 0.268 Boston College
Dani Sadek USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG 0.611 Ohio State
Kate Hallett USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.100 Harvard
Katie Robinson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.129 Minnesota

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Gracyn Knowles 2024-25 · 0.92 PPG 0.548 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Zoe Cramer 2025-26 · 1.25 PPG — Mercyhurst AHA
Greta Nundahl 2013-14 · 0.96 PPG 0.519 St. Scholastica NCHA
Ashley Kloncz 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG 0.480 Augsburg MIAC
Kaleigh Martinson 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG 0.593 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.