← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Kaytlen Kratzer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.09
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0922
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.21
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2265
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

15%
NCAA D1W
2%
NCAA D3W
82%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2021-22 A21 Academy U19 CAHS-W 19 5 6 11 0.579 0.2077 0.2077
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2024-25 Hood College UCHC FR 19 1 1 2 0.105

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Dani Sadek USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG 0.611 Ohio State
Grace Bizal USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.35 PPG 0.268 Boston College
Kendra Nealey USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG 0.212 Cornell
Lauren Kelly NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG 0.208 Dartmouth
Erin O'Connor USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG 0.758 Cornell

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Ellie Newpower 2023-24 · 0.79 PPG 0.679 Hamline MIAC
Jenna Allen 2023-24 · 0.93 PPG 0.586 Augsburg MIAC
Taylor Lesnar 2024-25 · 1.50 PPG 0.357 St. Norbert NCHA
Riley Viner 2012-13 · 1.72 PPG 0.308 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Madison Tix 2017-18 · 0.76 PPG 0.696 Williams NESCAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.