Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Kimball Union | NE-Prep-Girls | 6 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.830 | 0.2696 | 0.2696 |
| 2016-17 | Kimball Union | NE-Prep-Girls | 23 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.430 | 0.1397 | 0.1397 |
| 2017-18 | Kimball Union | NE-Prep-Girls | 27 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 0.480 | 0.1559 | 0.1559 |
| 2018-19 | Kimball Union | NE-Prep-Girls | 24 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.040 | 0.0130 | 0.0130 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Norwich | NEHC | SR | 27 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 0.519 |
| 2021-22 | Norwich | NEHC | JR | 27 | 1 | 13 | 14 | 0.519 |
| 2020-21 | Norwich | NEHC | SO | 8 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.625 |
| 2019-20 | Norwich | NEHC | FR | 26 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.269 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paige Sorensen | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.09 PPG | 0.529 | Merrimack |
| Hannah Schultz | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG | 0.267 | Union |
| Anna Erickson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG | 0.030 | Vermont |
| Katarina Seper | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG | 0.050 | RPI |
| McKenzie Sederberg | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG | 0.125 | Minnesota State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaiya Johnson | 2024-25 · 0.38 PPG | 0.074 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | WIAC |
| Maggie Jacoby | 2022-23 · 0.13 PPG | 0.200 | Nazareth | UCHC |
| Annie Sommer | 2022-23 · 0.07 PPG | — | King's | UCHC |
| Alexa March | 2023-24 · 0.21 PPG | 0.095 | Saint Mary's | MIAC |
| Bailey Coole | 2022-23 · 0.52 PPG | 0.042 | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.