← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Kaylee Mandeville Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-09-01 Country: USA Height: 5'6" (167 cm)
NCAA-W Projection
Merrimack
Verbal HEA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.12
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1215
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.30
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3198
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

8%
NCAA D1W
18%
NCAA D3W
75%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 NAHA Red 16U 16U-AAA-W 64 5 9 14 0.219 0.0703 0.0726
2024-25 19U-AAA-W 17 3 4 7 0.412 0.1690 0.1690
2025-26 19U-AAA-W 64 2 12 14 0.219 0.0898 0.0898
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Emma Turbyville NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG 0.040 St. Cloud State
Amanda Kimmerle USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.059 RPI
Megan Hinze USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.182 Minnesota State
Andrea Olson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG 0.056 Merrimack
Arianna Kosakowski NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG 0.000 Union

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Kylie Ligday 2022-23 · 0.81 PPG 0.280 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Jorja Jusczak 2023-24 · 1.00 PPG 0.240 Saint Benedict MIAC
Olivia Patnode 2022-23 · 0.63 PPG Saint Mary's MIAC
Macy Janssen 2022-23 · 0.74 PPG 0.333 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Aubree McDonagh 2023-24 · 0.59 PPG 0.360 St. Catherine MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.