← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Sophie Rousseau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-08-13 Country: USA Height: 5'9" (175 cm)
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.05
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0559
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.13
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.1371
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

5%
NCAA D1W
2%
NCAA D3W
92%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 Philadelphia Jr Flyers 19U JWHL-U19 21 2 4 6 0.286 0.1109 0.1041
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Quinnipiac ECAC-W FR 26 0 1 1 0.038

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Briana Jorde USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG 0.077 Bemidji State
Cheyenne Harris USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.324 Union
Taylor Turnquist USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.171 Clarkson
Taylor Flaherty USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG 0.000 North Dakota
Amanda Kimmerle USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.059 RPI

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Tallulah Bryant 2022-23 · 1.00 PPG 0.273 Lake Forest NCHA
Allie LeClaire 2023-24 · 0.79 PPG 0.333 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Charlotte Bellmont 2024-25 · 0.69 PPG Saint Benedict MIAC
Chloe Summerfield 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG 0.500 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Lauren Spear 2017-18 · 0.88 PPG 0.308 St. Olaf MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.