← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Grace Bowlby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-09-19 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.53
Strong (0.45–0.70)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.5104
Conf. Strength0.994
Year Adj (FR)×0.87
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.30
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3177
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2012-13 Edina High USHS-MN-W 25 0 6 6 0.240 0.0385 0.0385
2013-14 Edina High USHS-MN-W 25 4 13 17 0.680 0.1092 0.1092
2014-15 Edina High USHS-MN-W 22 5 14 19 0.864 0.1387 0.1387
2015-16 Edina High USHS-MN-W 22 2 13 15 0.682 0.1095 0.1095
2016-17 Edina High USHS-MN-W 25 8 16 24 0.960 0.1542 0.1542
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2021-22 Wisconsin SR 38 1 24 25 0.658
2020-21 Wisconsin JR 21 0 18 18 0.857
2019-20 Wisconsin SO 36 3 17 20 0.556
2018-19 Wisconsin FR 41 0 12 12 0.293
2017-18 Wisconsin WCHA-W FR 38 0 12 12 0.316

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Mekenzie Steffen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG 0.350 Wisconsin
Kate Hallett USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.100 Harvard
Katie Robinson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.129 Minnesota
Kenzie Prater USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG 0.432 Quinnipiac
Allison Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG 0.000 Quinnipiac

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.