Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Andover High | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 0.458 | 0.0692 | 0.0692 |
| 2020-21 | Andover High | USHS-MN-W | 23 | 5 | 14 | 19 | 0.826 | 0.1247 | 0.1247 |
| 2021-22 | Minnetonka High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 29 | 9 | 30 | 39 | 1.345 | 0.2031 | 0.2031 |
| 2022-23 | Minnetonka High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 30 | 9 | 31 | 40 | 1.333 | 0.2013 | 0.2013 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Vermont | HEA-W | SO | 38 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 0.395 |
| 2024-25 | Vermont | HEA-W | FR | 36 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.111 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grace Bizal | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.35 PPG | 0.268 | Boston College |
| Dani Sadek | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG | 0.611 | Ohio State |
| Kendra Nealey | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG | 0.212 | Cornell |
| Lauren Kelly | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG | 0.208 | Dartmouth |
| Erin O'Connor | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG | 0.758 | Cornell |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avery Engbrecht | 2023-24 · 1.27 PPG | 0.370 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | WIAC |
| Gracyn Knowles | 2024-25 · 0.92 PPG | 0.548 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Brittany Foster | 2017-18 · 1.22 PPG | — | William Smith | NEHC |
| Emme Nelson | 2017-18 · 0.73 PPG | 0.667 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Natasha Steinle | 2015-16 · 0.67 PPG | 0.731 | Buffalo State | SUNYAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.