Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | SAHA U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2021-22 | SAHA U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 25 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 0.760 | 0.1741 | 0.1741 |
| 2022-23 | SAHA U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 26 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 0.808 | 0.1850 | 0.1850 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-27 | RPI | ECAC-W | SR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2026-27 | RPI | ECAC | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2025-26 | RPI | ECAC-W | JR | 33 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 0.394 |
| 2024-25 | Union | ECAC-W | SO | 34 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.147 |
| 2023-24 | Union | ECAC-W | FR | 33 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 0.303 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kendra Nealey | USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG | 0.212 | Cornell |
| Grace Bizal | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG | 0.268 | Boston College |
| Kate Hallett | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.100 | Harvard |
| Katie Robinson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG | 0.129 | Minnesota |
| Dani Sadek | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG | 0.611 | Ohio State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emily Heid | 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG | 0.593 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
| Abigail Chamernick | 2022-23 · 1.17 PPG | 0.500 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Grace Karakas | 2023-24 · 1.38 PPG | 0.417 | SUNY Cortland | SUNYAC |
| Tia Lascelle | 2021-22 · 0.67 PPG | 0.893 | Adrian | NCHA |
| Jenna Curtis | 2013-14 · 2.68 PPG | 0.222 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.