← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Sydney Bryant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-10-14 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
St. Thomas
Verbal CHA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — CHA-W
0.27
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2658
Conf. Strength0.920
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.59
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.6228
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

18%
NCAA D1W
2%
NCAA D3W
80%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 — 19U-AAA-W 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.2052 0.2052
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State WCHA-W SO 37 2 7 9 0.243
2024-25 St. Cloud State WCHA-W FR 18 0 0 0 0.000

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Grace Bizal USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.35 PPG 0.268 Boston College
Dani Sadek USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG 0.611 Ohio State
Erin O'Connor USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG 0.758 Cornell
Kendra Nealey USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG 0.212 Cornell
Lauren Kelly NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG 0.208 Dartmouth

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Jenna Allen 2023-24 · 0.93 PPG 0.586 Augsburg MIAC
Mia Montanari 2024-25 · 1.08 PPG 0.500 RPI ECAC
Flora Pasztor 2025-26 · 1.35 PPG — Post NE10
Ellie Newpower 2023-24 · 0.79 PPG 0.679 Hamline MIAC
Taylor Lesnar 2024-25 · 1.50 PPG 0.357 St. Norbert NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.