Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Central York Panthers | OWHL-U22 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.286 | 0.0999 | 0.0999 |
| 2023-24 | Central York Panthers | OWHL-U22 | 40 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 0.425 | 0.1486 | 0.1486 |
| 2024-25 | Durham West Jr. Lightning | OWHL-U22 | 42 | 0 | 13 | 13 | 0.309 | 0.1082 | 0.1082 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-27 | RPI | ECAC-W | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2026-27 | RPI | ECAC | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2025-26 | RPI | ECAC-W | FR | 27 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.037 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Briana Jorde | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG | 0.077 | Bemidji State |
| Taylor Flaherty | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG | 0.000 | North Dakota |
| Cheyenne Harris | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG | 0.324 | Union |
| Taylor Turnquist | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG | 0.171 | Clarkson |
| Heidi Witt | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG | 0.000 | New Hampshire |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sophia Zebro | 2015-16 · 1.13 PPG | 0.346 | Saint Mary's | MIAC |
| Emily Bauer | 2014-15 · 0.78 PPG | 0.500 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Kathryn Pohl | 2017-18 · 0.70 PPG | 0.556 | Amherst | NESCAC |
| Kate Donegan | 2023-24 · 0.78 PPG | 0.500 | Mercyhurst | AHA |
| Serena Seiple | 2018-19 · 0.86 PPG | 0.458 | Connecticut College | NESCAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.