← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Megan Juricko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.07
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0790
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.17
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.1833
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2010-11 Eagan High USHS-MN-W 25 5 13 18 0.720 0.1087 0.1087
2011-12 Eagan High USHS-MN-W 24 5 10 15 0.625 0.0944 0.0944
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2012-13 Wisconsin-River Falls NCHA FR 12 1 1 2 0.167

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Cheyenne Harris USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.324 Union
Taylor Turnquist USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.171 Clarkson
Amanda Kimmerle USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.059 RPI
Megan Hinze USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.182 Minnesota State
Emma Turbyville NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG 0.040 St. Cloud State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Kylie Ligday 2022-23 · 0.81 PPG 0.280 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Aubree McDonagh 2023-24 · 0.59 PPG 0.360 St. Catherine MIAC
Jorja Jusczak 2023-24 · 1.00 PPG 0.240 Saint Benedict MIAC
Mckenzie Perry 2024-25 · 2.30 PPG 0.100 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Audrey McClurg 2024-25 · 0.52 PPG — Concordia MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.