← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Sophie Erlam Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: Canada Height: 5'8" (172 cm)
NCAA-W Projection
Mercyhurst
Verbal CHA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.16
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1711
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.52
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.5509
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

0%
NCAA D1W
8%
NCAA D3W
92%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 SAHA U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 1 4 5 0.167 0.0382 0.0382
2024-25 SAHA U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 6 14 20 0.667 0.1527 0.1527
2025-26 SAHA U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 2 22 24 0.800 0.1833 0.1833
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Kendra Nealey USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG 0.212 Cornell
Grace Bizal USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG 0.268 Boston College
Kate Hallett USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.100 Harvard
Katie Robinson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.129 Minnesota
Lauren Boyle USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.08 PPG 0.486 Ohio State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Emily Heid 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG 0.593 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Abigail Chamernick 2022-23 · 1.17 PPG 0.500 Hamline MIAC
Grace Karakas 2023-24 · 1.38 PPG 0.417 SUNY Cortland SUNYAC
Bryn Labbe 2014-15 · 0.85 PPG 0.692 Norwich NEHC
Amanda Broman 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG 0.500 St. Scholastica NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.