IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob LeBlanc Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-06-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kitchener Rangers OHL 68 4 16 20 0.294 0.1701 0.1779 0.7701 0.8053
2022-23 Niagara IceDogs OHL 66 4 23 27 0.409 0.2367 0.2373 1.0712 1.0739
2023-24 Sarnia Sting OHL 68 7 40 47 0.691 0.3999 0.3818 1.8098 1.7277
2024-25 North Bay Battalion OHL 68 10 42 52 0.765 0.4424 0.3995 2.0023 1.8081
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 AHA — 36 1 15 16 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2025-26 · Mercyhurst
+20.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2025
Defenseman overall
#430
Defenseman born in 2004
#521
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Quinn Waller
Adrian · 2006-07
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
T.J. Sneath
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Moodie
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.