| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | — | OHL | 54 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 0.259 | 0.1505 | 0.1657 | 0.6645 | 0.7316 |
| 2022-23 | — | OHL | 66 | 23 | 20 | 43 | 0.651 | 0.3781 | 0.4000 | 1.6695 | 1.7660 |
| 2023-24 | — | OHL | 68 | 58 | 53 | 111 | 1.632 | 0.9473 | 0.9567 | 4.1830 | 4.2246 |
| 2024-25 | North Bay Battalion | OHL | 35 | 21 | 14 | 35 | 1.000 | 0.5803 | 0.5561 | 2.5625 | 2.4557 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Michigan | D1 | BigTen | — | 37 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 0.757 |
| 2025-26 | Michigan State | D1 | BigTen | FR | 37 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 0.757 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.